Compare Nissan Murano vs Nissan X-Trail vs Nissan Rogue
Variants
AWD
FWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.0 Euro4 AWD
2.0 AWD AT
2.2 dCi 114 AWD
2.2 dCi 136
2.2 dCi 136 AWD
2.5 AWD
2.5 AWD AT
AWD
AWD 2011+
FWD
FWD 2011+
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
923 L / 32.6 cu-ft ~ 2005 L / 70.8 cu-ft
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1841 L / 65.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
82.0 L / 21.7 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link, Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R18
215/70 R16, 225/60 R17, 225/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
211 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1690 mm / 66.5 in
1675 mm / 65.9 in
Size | Length
4765 mm / 187.6 in
Size | Width
1880 mm / 74.0 in
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1801 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
18 in
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17, 7.0J x 18
Wheelbase
2825 mm / 111.2 in
2625 mm / 103.3 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.3 sec
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Powertrain
Engine
QR25DE
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Power
248.0 hp / 184.9 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
70.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
68.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
333 Nm / 245.6 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
237 Nm / 174.8 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
29%
25%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Better appointed than the Qashqai
Cons
- Strange design
- No powerful engine options
- CVT
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Slow and sluggish
- Uncomfortable
- No powerful engine options
- Poor fit and finish
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.