HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Kia e-Niro vs Kia Soul 3 vs Kia Soul

Variants
42 kWh
67 kWh
1.6 GDI DCT
2.0 MPI
2.0 MPI CVT
e-Soul 39.2 kWh
e-Soul 67 kWh
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
451 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1405 L / 49.6 cu-ft
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
410 kg / 904 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 305x25 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 300x10 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
16.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/55 R17
195/65R15
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Lithium-polymer
Body Style
5-door battery-electric SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1570 mm / 61.8 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4375 mm / 172.2 in
4105 mm / 161.6 in
Size | Width
1805 mm / 71.1 in
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
42.0 m / 137.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Euro 4
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2018 ~ 2021
2009 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
17%
14%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Smart styling
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Distinct styling
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor handling
  • Low build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.