Compare Kia Venga vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II vs Citroen C3 Picasso

Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II Minivan (2013-2018)

Kia | Cars

Citroen | Cars

Variants

1.4

1.4 CRDI 77

1.4 CRDI 90

1.6

1.6 AT

1.6 CRDI 115

1.6 CRDI 128

1.2 131

1.2 131 AT

1.6 120

1.6 156

1.6 165 AT

1.6 HDi 116

1.6 HDi 116 AT

1.6 HDi 120

1.6 HDi 120 AT

1.6 HDi 92

1.6 HDi 92 AT

1.6 HDi 99

2.0 HDi 150

2.0 HDi 150 AT

1.4 VTi

1.4 VTi Euro5

1.4 VTi LPG

1.6 e-HDi

1.6 HDi 109PS

1.6 HDi 112PS

1.6 HDi 90PS

1.6 VTi 115PS

1.6 VTi 120PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

440 L / 15.5 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

48.0 L / 12.7 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Double-wishbone

Semi-independent, coil spring

Turning Circle

10.4 m / 34.1 ft

11.3 m / 37.1 ft

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door SUV

5-door Minivan

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height

1600 mm / 63.0 in

1638 mm / 64.5 in

1669 mm / 65.7 in

Size | Length

4068 mm / 160.2 in

4078 mm / 160.6 in

Size | Width

1765 mm / 69.5 in

1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)

1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1573.0 mm / 61.9 in

1466.0 mm / 57.7 in

Track Width | Rear

1576.0 mm / 62.0 in

1465.0 mm / 57.7 in

Wheelbase

2615 mm / 103.0 in

2840 mm / 111.8 in

2540 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.30

0.308

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Production

Availability

2010 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score

18%

33%

Pros

Small turning circle
Decent styling

Low fuel consumption
High cargo capacity
Good towing capacity
Improved exterior styling

Easy to fix

Cons

Slow and sluggish
Miserably low engine output
Uninspiring

Not as handsome as the 5-seater
Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Very ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.