Compare BMW X1 F48 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift

BMW X1 F48

Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift

BMW X1 F48Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift
Variants
16d sDrive
18d sDrive
18d sDrive Euro6df
18d sDrive AT
18d sDrive Euro6d AT
18d xDrive Euro6d
18d xDrive
18d xDrive AT
18d xDrive Euro6d AT
18i sDrive
18i sDrive AT
18i sDrive Euro6d
18i sDrive Euro6d AT
20d sDrive
20d sDrive AT
20d xDrive AT
20d xDrive Euro6d AT
20i sDrive Euro6d AT
20i sDrive AT
20i xDrive AT
20i xDrive Euro6d AT
25d xDrive AT
25i xDrive AT
25i xDrive Euro6d AT
GLA 180
GLA 180 DCT
GLA 180d
GLA 180d DCT
GLA 200
GLA 200 DCT
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 200d DCT
GLA 220 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220 DCT
GLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220d DCT
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC DCT
GLA 250 DCT
GLA 45 AMG 4MATIC DCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score31%36%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Effeminate styling
  • Only available with small engines
  • Falsely sold as SUV
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.