Compare Mazda CX-9 vs Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda CX-9 II
Variants
3.5 AWD
3.7
3.7 2010+
3.7 2013+
3.7 AWD 2013+
3.7 AWD 2010+
2.0 160 AWD
2.0 160 AWD AT
2.0 165
2.0 160 Euro6 AWD
2.0 160 Euro6 AWD AT
2.0 165 Euro6
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AWD
2.2D 150 AWD AT
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 175 AWD
2.2D 175 AWD AT
2.5 192 AWD AT
AWD
FWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
487 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 2852 L / 100.7 cu-ft
503 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1620 L / 57.2 cu-ft
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 2017 L / 71.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.9 L / 10.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
7
5
7
Payload
671 kg / 1479 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Trailing arm, Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/60 R18, 255/50 R20
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
210 mm / 8.3 in
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1710 mm / 67.3 in
1716 mm / 67.6 in
Size | Length
4555 mm / 179.3 in
5065 mm / 199.4 in
Size | Width
1969 mm / 77.5 in | 2207 mm / 86.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1654.0 mm / 65.1 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1656.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2875 mm / 113.2 in
2930 mm / 115.4 in
Performance
Top Speed
192.0 km/h / 119.3 mph
Powertrain
Engine
Ford Durtec 35
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Power
250.0 hp / 186.4 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.5 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
310 Nm / 228.6 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
65%
45%
37%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Good exterior styling
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Good styling
- Rather good engine
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.