Compare Renault Grand Espace 4 vs Mazda 5 facelift vs Renault Espace 4

Variants
1.9 dCi
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 131
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 AT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 TCe 170
2.0 TCe 170 Euro5
2.0 TCe 170 AT
2.0 Turbo 163
2.0 Turbo 163 AT
2.0 Turbo 170
2.0 Turbo 170 AT
2.2 dCi 139 AT
2.2 dCi 150
2.2 dCi 150 AT
3.0 dCi 177 AT
3.0 dCi 181 AT
3.5 AT
3.5 Euro3 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.9 dCi
2.0
2.0 136
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 130 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 AT
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 AT
2.0 TCe 170
2.0 Turbo 163
2.0 Turbo 163 AT
2.0 Turbo 170
2.0 Turbo 170 AT
2.0 Turbo 170 Euro3
2.2 dCi 139
2.2 dCi 150
2.2 dCi 150 AT
3.0 dCi 177 AT
3.0 dCi 181 AT
3.5 AT
3.5 Euro3 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
456 L / 16.1 cu-ft ~ 3050 L / 107.7 cu-ft
291 L / 10.3 cu-ft ~ 2860 L / 101.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
Passengers
7
7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
Track Width | Front
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2803 mm / 110.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.29
0.35
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
31%
38%
26%
Pros
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Lots of space inside
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved exterior design
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Lots of space inside
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.