HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Citroen C4 Picasso II vs Skoda Roomster vs Citroen C3 Picasso

Variants
1.2 110
1.2 130
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
1.2 64
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 AT
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 103
1.4 VTi
1.4 VTi Euro5
1.4 VTi LPG
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 VTi 115PS
1.6 VTi 120PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1780 L / 62.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1669 mm / 65.7 in
Size | Length
4078 mm / 160.6 in
Size | Width
1684 mm / 66.3 in
1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Wheelbase
2785 mm / 109.6 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.308

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
35%
17%
2%
Pros
  • Much improved exterior styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Lots of usable space inside for such a small car
  • Easy to fix
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.