Compare Citroen Grand C4 Picasso vs Renault Espace 4 vs Citroen C4 Picasso II
Variants
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109 6MT
1.6 HDi 109 5MT
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120 Euro5
1.6 120
1.8 125
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT
1.9 dCi
2.0
2.0 136
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 130 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 AT
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 AT
2.0 TCe 170
2.0 Turbo 163
2.0 Turbo 163 AT
2.0 Turbo 170
2.0 Turbo 170 AT
2.0 Turbo 170 Euro3
2.2 dCi 139
2.2 dCi 150
2.2 dCi 150 AT
3.0 dCi 177 AT
3.0 dCi 181 AT
3.5 AT
3.5 Euro3 AT
1.2 110
1.2 130
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft ~ 1951 L / 68.9 cu-ft
291 L / 10.3 cu-ft ~ 2860 L / 101.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
Passengers
7
7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4590 mm / 180.7 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2803 mm / 110.4 in
2785 mm / 109.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.35
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
24%
26%
35%
Pros
- More interior space than the Picasso
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Lots of space inside
- Much improved exterior styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Rather uglier than the Picasso
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.