Compare Kia Grand Carnival 2 vs Nissan Quest 3 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 5
Variants
2.2D AT
2.9D 170
2.9D 170 AT
2.9D 185 AT
2.9D 192 AT
3.5 AT
3.8 AT
2.4
2.8D 150
2.8D 163 AT
3.3
3.8 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
912 L / 32.2 cu-ft ~ 4007 L / 141.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
7
7
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
225/65 R16
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1778 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
5130 mm / 202.0 in
5184 mm / 204.1 in
Size | Width
1985 mm / 78.1 in
1971 mm / 77.6 in
Track Width | Front
1685.0 mm / 66.3 in
1700.0 mm / 66.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1685.0 mm / 66.3 in
1700.0 mm / 66.9 in
Wheelbase
3020 mm / 118.9 in
3150 mm / 124.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
233.0 hp / 173.7 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
66.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
318 Nm / 234.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
25%
30%
Pros
- Very high cargo capacity
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Spacious interior
- Lots of space inside
- Decent V6 engine
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Rather ugly exterior
- Poor automatic transmission
- Basic suspension setup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.