Compare Nissan Quest 3 vs Skoda Roomster vs Nissan Cube 2
Variants
1.2 64
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 AT
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 103
1.4
1.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1780 L / 62.9 cu-ft
1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Drum
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/65 R16
175/65 R14
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1778 mm / 70.0 in
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1645 mm / 64.8 in
Size | Length
5184 mm / 204.1 in
3900 mm / 153.5 in
Size | Width
1971 mm / 77.6 in
1684 mm / 66.3 in
1670 mm / 65.7 in
Track Width | Front
1700.0 mm / 66.9 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1700.0 mm / 66.9 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Weight
1060.0 kg / 2336.9 lbs
Wheelbase
3150 mm / 124.0 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
9.9:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
233.0 hp / 173.7 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
66.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
318 Nm / 234.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2009
2002 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
17%
6%
Pros
- Lots of space inside
- Decent V6 engine
- Lots of usable space inside for such a small car
- Very cute
- Easy to park
- Easy to maneuver in tight spaces
Cons
- Poor automatic transmission
- Basic suspension setup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.