Compare Mazda 8 vs Mazda 5 II vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II

Variants
2.3
2.3 AT
2.3T
1.6D
1.8
2.0 144 AT
2.0 150
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/55 R18
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1685 mm / 66.3 in
1615 mm / 63.6 in
1638 mm / 64.5 in
Size | Length
4870 mm / 191.7 in
4585 mm / 180.5 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in
1750 mm / 68.9 in
1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2950 mm / 116.1 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.30
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
2.3 L / 138.0 cu-in / 2261.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
62%
46%
33%
Pros
  • Exceptional exterior design
  • Good interior fit and finish
  • Unnecessary AWD
  • Good towing capacity
  • Excellent design
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved exterior styling
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Not as handsome as the 5-seater
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.