Compare Mazda 8 vs Citroen C3 Picasso vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II
Variants
2.3
2.3 AT
2.3T
1.4 VTi
1.4 VTi Euro5
1.4 VTi LPG
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 VTi 115PS
1.6 VTi 120PS
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/55 R18
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1685 mm / 66.3 in
1669 mm / 65.7 in
1638 mm / 64.5 in
Size | Length
4870 mm / 191.7 in
4078 mm / 160.6 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in
1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2950 mm / 116.1 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
0.30
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
2.3 L / 138.0 cu-in / 2261.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
2%
33%
Pros
- Exceptional exterior design
- Good interior fit and finish
- Unnecessary AWD
- Easy to fix
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Improved exterior styling
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
- Not as handsome as the 5-seater
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.