Compare Mazda 5 facelift vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II vs Citroen C8

Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 HDi 109
2.0 HDi 109 AT
2.0 HDi 120
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 140
2.0 140 AT
2.2 HDi 128
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170 AT
2.2 158
3.0 204 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft ~ 2948 L / 104.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
7
7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1638 mm / 64.5 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4727 mm / 186.1 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2823 mm / 111.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
38%
33%
20%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved exterior design
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved exterior styling
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Not as handsome as the 5-seater
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Some unreliable petrol engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor automatic transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.