Compare Mazda 5 facelift vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109 6MT
1.6 HDi 109 5MT
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120 Euro5
1.6 120
1.8 125
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft ~ 1951 L / 68.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1660 mm / 65.4 in
1638 mm / 64.5 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4590 mm / 180.7 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.31
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
38%
24%
33%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved exterior design
- More interior space than the Picasso
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Improved exterior styling
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Rather uglier than the Picasso
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Not as handsome as the 5-seater
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.