Compare Mazda 5 vs Renault Espace 5 facelift vs Renault Grand Modus
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.8 TCe 225 4CONTROL
1.8 TCe 225
2.0 dCi 160 4CONTROL
2.0 dCi 160
2.0 dCi 200 4CONTROL
2.0 dCi 200
1.2
1.2 TCe
1.5 dCi 103 AT
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86 5MT
1.5 dCi 86 6MT
1.6 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
305 L / 10.8 cu-ft ~ 1454 L / 51.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
7
5 / 7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 290 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
235/60 R18
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1589 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4859 mm / 191.3 in
4034 mm / 158.8 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1888 mm / 74.3 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded) | 1914 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1709 mm / 67.3 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1621.0 mm / 63.8 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2884 mm / 113.5 in
2575 mm / 101.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Euro 4
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic EDC
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2008
2020
2004 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
14%
3%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good interior seating / cargo space
- High cargo capacity
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Very ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Very ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.