Compare BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer F46 vs Chevrolet Orlando (J309) vs Chevrolet Uplander

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer F46

Chevrolet Orlando (J309)

Chevrolet Uplander

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer F46Chevrolet Orlando (J309)Chevrolet Uplander
Variants
214d
216d
216d AT
216i
218d
218d AT
218d xDrive
218d xDrive AT
218i
218i AT
220d
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i
220i AT
1.4 turbo
1.8 AT
1.8
2.0D 131
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
3.5 AWD
3.5 FWD
3.9

Reviews

Neofiliac score43%20%26%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside
  • Lots of space inside
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of space inside
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspension
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.