Compare Fiat Punto 199 vs Renault Zoe vs Fiat 500e
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.2 69
1.3 Multijet 85
1.3 Multijet 95
1.4 77
1.4 MultiAir 105
1.4 T-Jet 135
Q210
Q90
R110
R240
R75
R90 22kWh
R90 41kWh
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
338 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
198 L / 7.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 279.4x22.1 mm
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc, 238.76x10.16 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 185/55 R15 Rear wheel tires: 185/55 R15
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
9.5 m / 31.2 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
24.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
3/5-door Hatchback
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
3-door battery-electric Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1527 mm / 60.1 in
Size | Length
4065 mm / 160.0 in
4084 mm / 160.8 in
3617 mm / 142.4 in
Size | Width
1687 mm / 66.4 in
1730 mm / 68.1 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1628 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Front
1473.0 mm / 58.0 in
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
1407.0 mm / 55.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
1397.0 mm / 55.0 in
Weight
1352.0 kg / 2980.7 lbs
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 5.5J x 15 Rear wheel rims: 6.5J x 15
Wheelbase
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2588 mm / 101.9 in
2301 mm / 90.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
0.311
Top Speed
135.0 km/h / 83.9 mph
142.0 km/h / 88.2 mph
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Power
113 hp / 84.3 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
18%
15%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Stylish design
- Easy to drive and park in big cities
- Cute exterior design
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Short electric range
- Air-cooled battery
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very little cargo space
- Questionable battery degradation
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.