Compare Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback vs Volvo S40 II facelift vs Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback

Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback

Volvo S40 II facelift

Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback

Ford Mondeo 2 LiftbackVolvo S40 II faceliftFord Mondeo 2 Liftback
Variants
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204

Reviews

Neofiliac score29%36%29%
Pros
  • Lots of room inside
  • Good value for money
  • Easy to work on
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Lots of room inside
  • Good value for money
  • Easy to work on
Cons
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.