Compare Kia Rio IV Hatchback vs Kia Pro Cee'd vs Kia Rio III 3-door

Variants
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.25 MPI
1.4 CRDi 77
1.4 CRDi 90
1.4 MPI
1.4 MPI AT
1.4
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 AT
1.6 CRDi 128
1.6 CRDi 128 AT
1.6 CRDi 90
1.1 CRDi
1.2
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 CRDi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
325 L / 11.5 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
340 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1210 L / 42.7 cu-ft
288 L / 10.2 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion bar
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
185/65 R15, 195/55 R16, 205/45 R17
185/65 R15, 195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
185/65 R15, 195/55 R16, 205/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.3 m / 33.9 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4065 mm / 160.0 in
4250 mm / 167.3 in
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in
1790 mm / 70.5 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in | 1985 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1507.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
15 in, 16 in
5.5J x 15, 6.0J x 16, 6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Euro 5
Euro 6

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2012
2012 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
27%
22%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Elegant styling
  • Independent rear suspensions
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.