HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Kia Rio III 3-door vs Kia Forte II Hatchback vs Kia Rio II Hatchback

Variants
1.1 CRDi
1.2
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 CRDi
1.6 GDi AT
2.0 GDi
2.0 GDi AT
1.4
1.4 AT
1.5 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
288 L / 10.2 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
657 L / 23.2 cu-ft
272 L / 9.6 cu-ft ~ 1107 L / 39.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/65 R15, 195/55 R16, 205/45 R17
175/70 R14
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
4350 mm / 171.3 in
3990 mm / 157.1 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in | 1985 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1507.0 mm / 59.3 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Wheel Size
5.5J x 15, 6.0J x 16, 6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2500 mm / 98.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2017
2017 ~ 2018
2005 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
22%
14%
12%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • More spacious than Cee'd
  • Clean design
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.