HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Kia Rio II Hatchback vs Kia Rio III 3-door vs Kia Pro Cee'd

Variants
1.4
1.4 AT
1.5 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
1.1 CRDi
1.2
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 CRDi
1.4
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 AT
1.6 CRDi 128
1.6 CRDi 128 AT
1.6 CRDi 90

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
272 L / 9.6 cu-ft ~ 1107 L / 39.1 cu-ft
288 L / 10.2 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
340 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1210 L / 42.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion bar
Tire Size
175/70 R14
185/65 R15, 195/55 R16, 205/45 R17
185/65 R15, 195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
10.3 m / 33.9 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
3990 mm / 157.1 in
4050 mm / 159.4 in
4250 mm / 167.3 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in | 1985 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1790 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1507.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Wheel Size
5.5J x 15, 6.0J x 16, 6.5J x 17
15 in, 16 in
Wheelbase
2500 mm / 98.4 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2009
2012 ~ 2017
2006 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
22%
27%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Elegant styling
  • Independent rear suspensions
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.