HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mazda 2 II vs SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe vs Audi A1

Variants
1.3 75
1.3 75 Euro5
1.3 84
1.3 86
1.4 CD
1.5 102
1.5 102 AT
1.5 103
1.5 103 AT
1.6 CD 90
1.6 CD 95
1.0 75
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 Euro5
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TFSI 180 Cupra
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.4 TSI 180 DSG Cupra
1.6 105
1.6 105 DSG
1.6 81
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.8 TSI 192 Cupra
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 143
2.0 TDI 143 FR
1.2 TFSI
1.4 TFSI 122
1.4 TFSI 122 DCT
1.4 TFSI 140
1.4 TFSI 140 DCT
1.4 TFSI 185 DCT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT
2.0 TDI

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 787 L / 27.8 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
375 kg / 827 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1416 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
3954 mm / 155.7 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheelbase
2490 mm / 98.0 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
17%
22%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Better looking than the Sportback
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.