Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift 2 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift vs Nissan Micra 4

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.2
1.2 CVT
1.2 DIG-S
1.2 DIG-S CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
Passengers
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
9.3 m / 30.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Form Factor
3/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1525 mm / 60.0 in
Size | Length
4063 mm / 160.0 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1469.0 mm / 57.8 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2450 mm / 96.5 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 5
Engine | Displacement
1.2 L / 73.1 cu-in / 1198.0 cc
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
23%
4%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.