HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift 2 vs Mazda 2 II vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.3 75
1.3 75 Euro5
1.3 84
1.3 86
1.4 CD
1.5 102
1.5 102 AT
1.5 103
1.5 103 AT
1.6 CD 90
1.6 CD 95
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 787 L / 27.8 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4063 mm / 160.0 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1469.0 mm / 57.8 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2490 mm / 98.0 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
6%
23%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.