Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2 vs Nissan Micra / March 4 (K13) vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Nissan Micra / March 4 (K13)

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2Nissan Micra / March 4 (K13)Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.2
1.2 CVT
1.2 DIG-S
1.2 DIG-S CVT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score23%4%23%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.