Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2 vs Nissan Note (E11) vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Nissan Note (E11)

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2Nissan Note (E11)Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.4 88
1.4 88 2010+
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 90
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score23%4%23%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Engine reliability and repair-ability are fine
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Rigid rear axle
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.