Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2 vs BMW 1 Series F40 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

BMW 1 Series F40

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2BMW 1 Series F40Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
116d
116d AT
116i
116i AT
118d
118d AT
118i
118i AT
118i Euro6d
118i Euro6d AT
120d AT
120d xDrive AT
120i AT
128ti AT
M135i Euro6d xDrive AT
M135i xDrive
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score23%26%23%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.