Compare Subaru Forester 2 vs Subaru Crosstrek 2 vs Subaru Crosstrek
Variants
2.0X
2.0X AT
2.0XT
2.0XT AT
2.5 158PS
2.5 158PS AT
2.5 165PS
2.5 165PS AT
2.5 173PS
2.5 173PS AT
2.5T
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.5 CVT
1.6 CVT
1.6 MT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.0DL
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
406 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1525 L / 53.9 cu-ft
589 L / 20.8 cu-ft ~ 1566 L / 55.3 cu-ft
1270 L / 44.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 294.64 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 274.32 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.6 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
221 mm / 8.7 in
Size | Height
1615 mm / 63.6 in
Size | Length
4450 mm / 175.2 in
4483 mm / 176.5 in
4450 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1735 mm / 68.3 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2664 mm / 104.9 in
2635 mm / 103.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Stroke
89.9 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2020
2012 ~ 2017
Made In
Japan, Malaysia, Thailand
Reviews
Neofiliac score
34%
36%
33%
Pros
- Characteristic H4 engiens
- Symmetric AWD
- Some offroad capabilities
- Characterful engines
- Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- MacPherson front suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Horrible CVT
- Bad styling
- Basic interior
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.