Compare Seat Ibiza 4 ST vs Renault Megane 3 Grand Tour vs Renault Clio 4 Estate
Variants
1.0
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4
1.4 TSI
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 140
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
FR 1.4 TSI DSG
1.2 Energy TCe 115
1.2 Energy TCe 115 Stop&Start
1.2 Energy TCe 130 Stop&Start
1.2 TCe 130 Stop&Start AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.5 Energy dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.6 100
1.6 110
1.6 110 Ethanol
1.6 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
GT 2.0 dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe 190 Stop&Start
GT 2.0 TCe 220 Stop&Start
0.9 Energy TCe
1.2
1.2 TCe AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi AT
1.5 Energy dCi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
524 L / 18.5 cu-ft ~ 1595 L / 56.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.2 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4559 mm / 179.5 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
1732 mm / 68.2 in
Track Width | Front
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1457.0 mm / 57.4 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2703 mm / 106.4 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
2%
13%
4%
Pros
- Low officiall fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low official fuel consumption
- Easy to DIY
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Not even fully independent suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.