Compare Citroen C3 Picasso vs Citroen C8 vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II

Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II Minivan (2013-2018)

Citroen | Cars

Variants

1.4 VTi

1.4 VTi Euro5

1.4 VTi LPG

1.6 e-HDi

1.6 HDi 109PS

1.6 HDi 112PS

1.6 HDi 90PS

1.6 VTi 115PS

1.6 VTi 120PS

2.0 HDi 163

2.0 HDi 163 AT

2.0 HDi 109

2.0 HDi 109 AT

2.0 HDi 120

2.0 HDi 136

2.0 136

2.0 136 AT

2.0 140

2.0 140 AT

2.2 HDi 128

2.2 HDi Biturbo 170

2.2 HDi Biturbo 170 AT

2.2 158

3.0 204 AT

1.2 131

1.2 131 AT

1.6 120

1.6 156

1.6 165 AT

1.6 HDi 116

1.6 HDi 116 AT

1.6 HDi 120

1.6 HDi 120 AT

1.6 HDi 92

1.6 HDi 92 AT

1.6 HDi 99

2.0 HDi 150

2.0 HDi 150 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

225 L / 7.9 cu-ft ~ 2948 L / 104.1 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

80.0 L / 21.1 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, coil spring

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Height

1669 mm / 65.7 in

1638 mm / 64.5 in

Size | Length

4078 mm / 160.6 in

4727 mm / 186.1 in

Size | Width

1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)

1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1466.0 mm / 57.7 in

1570.0 mm / 61.8 in

1573.0 mm / 61.9 in

Track Width | Rear

1465.0 mm / 57.7 in

1576.0 mm / 62.0 in

Wheelbase

2540 mm / 100.0 in

2823 mm / 111.1 in

2840 mm / 111.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.308

0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score

20%

33%

Pros

Easy to fix

High cargo capacity
Good towing capacity

Low fuel consumption
High cargo capacity
Good towing capacity
Improved exterior styling

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Very ugly

Some unreliable petrol engines
Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
No independent rear suspensions
Poor automatic transmissions

Not as handsome as the 5-seater
Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.