Compare Renault Megane 2 Grand Tour vs Renault Laguna 2 Estate vs Renault Megane 4 Grand Tour

Variants
1.4 98PS
1.5 dCi 100PS
1.5 dCi 100PS AT
1.5 dCi 106PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 86PS
1.6 112PS
1.6 112PS AT
1.6 113PS
1.6 113PS AT
1.9 dCi 110PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
1.9 dCi 130PS
1.9 dCi 90PS
2.0 135PS
1.5 dCi 101PS
1.5 dCi 105PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 82PS Euro4
1.6 107PS
1.6 112PS
1.8 120PS
1.9 dCi 100PS
1.9 dCi 107PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
2.0 136PS
GT
2.0 Turbo 170PS
2.0 Turbo 165PS
2.0 IDE 140PS
2.2 dCi 150PS
2.2 dCi 150PS AT
3.0 207PS
1.2 Energy TCe 100PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS AT
1.3 TCe 115PS
1.3 TCe 140PS
1.3 TCe 140PS AT
1.3 TCe 160PS
1.3 TCe 160PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 95PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS AT
1.5 Energy dCi 90PS
1.6 Energy dCi 130PS
1.6 SCe 115PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
GT 1.6 Energy dCi AT
GT 1.6 Energy TCe AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1600 L / 56.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent rear suspension
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1467 mm / 57.8 in
1443 mm / 56.8 in
Size | Length
4500 mm / 177.2 in
4695 mm / 184.8 in
4626 mm / 182.1 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2026 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1772 mm / 69.8 in
1814 mm / 71.4 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2686 mm / 105.7 in
2740 mm / 107.9 in
2712 mm / 106.8 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
10%
14%
Pros
  • Much better looking than the sedan
  • Card key that allowed the owner to show off at the time
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • No fully independent suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.