HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Clio 4 Estate vs Renault Megane 2 Grand Tour vs Renault Megane 3 Grand Tour

Variants
0.9 Energy TCe
1.2
1.2 TCe AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi AT
1.5 Energy dCi
1.4 98PS
1.5 dCi 100PS
1.5 dCi 100PS AT
1.5 dCi 106PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 86PS
1.6 112PS
1.6 112PS AT
1.6 113PS
1.6 113PS AT
1.9 dCi 110PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
1.9 dCi 130PS
1.9 dCi 90PS
2.0 135PS
1.2 Energy TCe 115
1.2 Energy TCe 115 Stop&Start
1.2 Energy TCe 130 Stop&Start
1.2 TCe 130 Stop&Start AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.5 Energy dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.6 100
1.6 110
1.6 110 Ethanol
1.6 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
GT 2.0 dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe 190 Stop&Start
GT 2.0 TCe 220 Stop&Start

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1600 L / 56.5 cu-ft
524 L / 18.5 cu-ft ~ 1595 L / 56.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.2 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
1467 mm / 57.8 in
Size | Length
4267 mm / 168.0 in
4500 mm / 177.2 in
4559 mm / 179.5 in
Size | Width
1732 mm / 68.2 in
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2026 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2686 mm / 105.7 in
2703 mm / 106.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
4%
13%
13%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Much better looking than the sedan
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Easy to DIY
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Not even fully independent suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.