Compare Nissan Cube 2 vs Nissan Quest 3 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 5
Variants
1.4
1.5
2.4
2.8D 150
2.8D 163 AT
3.3
3.8 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
7
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
175/65 R14
225/65 R16
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
Station Wagon
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1645 mm / 64.8 in
1778 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
3900 mm / 153.5 in
5184 mm / 204.1 in
Size | Width
1670 mm / 65.7 in
1971 mm / 77.6 in
Track Width | Front
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1700.0 mm / 66.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1700.0 mm / 66.9 in
Weight
1060.0 kg / 2336.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
3150 mm / 124.0 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
233.0 hp / 173.7 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
66.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
318 Nm / 234.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2008
2003 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
25%
30%
Pros
- Very cute
- Easy to park
- Easy to maneuver in tight spaces
- Lots of space inside
- Decent V6 engine
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor automatic transmission
- Basic suspension setup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.