Compare Cadillac CTS 2 Sport Wagon
Cadillac CTS 2 Sport Wagon | |
---|---|
Variants | 3.0 3.0 AWD 3.6 3.6 AWD CTS-V MT CTS-V |
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 87% |
Pros |
|
Cons | |
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"720 L / 25.4 cu-ft ~ 1642 L / 58.0 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"10.3 L / 10.9 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"5.7 L / 6.0 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"68.0 L / 18.0 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"5"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Multi-link"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"235/55 R17, 235/50 R18, 245/45 R19"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Turning Circle","Fv":"11.1 m / 36.4 ft"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"5-door Station Wagon"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1473 mm / 58.0 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4878 mm / 192.0 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1842 mm / 72.5 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1570.0 mm / 61.8 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1581.0 mm / 62.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1821.0 kg / 4014.6 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"8J x 17, 8.5J x 18, 8.5J x 19"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2880 mm / 113.4 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Coefficient Of Drag","Fv":"0.34"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (combined) | 13.1 L/100km / 18.0 MPG (urban) | 8.7 L/100km / 27.0 MPG (highway)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Towing Capacity","Fv":"454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine","Fv":"LF1, LFW"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"89.0 mm / 3.5 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"11.7:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"3.0 L / 182.7 cu-in / 2994.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"273.0 hp / 203.6 kW @ 7000 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Redline","Fv":"7200 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"91.2 hp/L / 1.5 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"80.3 mm / 3.2 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"302 Nm / 222.7 lb-ft @ 5700 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"6-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic Hydra-Matic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2010 ~ 2014"}]]
Related Products
- Choice of M156 and M157 V8s (different model years)
- Rather robust engine lineup save for the M272/M273
· 80%
- No CVT problems
- Improved styling compared to the C5
- Has some capabilities on unpaved roads and increment weather
· 46%
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Good towing capacity
- Good 40v V8 in the first years of the model run
· 59%
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Improved adaptive air suspension
- Better looking than pre-facelift
· 60%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.