Compare Opel Astra K Sports Tourer vs Renault Clio 4 Estate vs Renault Laguna 2 Estate
Variants
1.0 T 105PS
1.0 T 105PS Easytronic
1.0 T 90PS
1.2 T 110PS
1.2 T 130PS
1.2 T 145PS
1.4
1.4 150PS
1.4 150PS AT
1.4 T 110PS
1.4 T 125PS
1.4 T 145PS CVT
1.4 T 150PS
1.4 T 150PS AT
1.5d 105PS
1.5d 122PS
1.5d 122PS AT
1.6 BiTurbo 150PS
1.6 CDTi 110PS
1.6 CDTi 136PS
1.6 CDTi 136PS AT
1.6 CDTi 95PS
1.6 CDTi Bi-Turbo
1.6 T
1.6 T AT
1.6d 110PS
1.6d 136PS
1.6d 136PS AT
0.9 Energy TCe
1.2
1.2 TCe AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi AT
1.5 Energy dCi
1.5 dCi 101PS
1.5 dCi 105PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 82PS Euro4
1.6 107PS
1.6 112PS
1.8 120PS
1.9 dCi 100PS
1.9 dCi 107PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
2.0 136PS
GT
2.0 Turbo 170PS
2.0 Turbo 165PS
2.0 IDE 140PS
2.2 dCi 150PS
2.2 dCi 150PS AT
3.0 207PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1630 L / 57.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent torsion beam
Semi-independent
Semi-independent rear suspension
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.2 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
1443 mm / 56.8 in
Size | Length
4702 mm / 185.1 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
4695 mm / 184.8 in
Size | Width
1809 mm / 71.2 in | 2042 mm / 80.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1871 mm / 73.7 in (mirror folded)
1732 mm / 68.2 in
1772 mm / 69.8 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheelbase
2662 mm / 104.8 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2740 mm / 107.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
9%
4%
10%
Pros
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Card key that allowed the owner to show off at the time
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Still uses semi-independent rear suspension
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Not even fully independent suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No fully independent suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.