Compare Opel Astra K Sports Tourer vs Opel Vectra C Caravan vs Opel Astra H Caravan
Variants
1.0 T 105PS
1.0 T 105PS Easytronic
1.0 T 90PS
1.2 T 110PS
1.2 T 130PS
1.2 T 145PS
1.4
1.4 150PS
1.4 150PS AT
1.4 T 110PS
1.4 T 125PS
1.4 T 145PS CVT
1.4 T 150PS
1.4 T 150PS AT
1.5d 105PS
1.5d 122PS
1.5d 122PS AT
1.6 BiTurbo 150PS
1.6 CDTi 110PS
1.6 CDTi 136PS
1.6 CDTi 136PS AT
1.6 CDTi 95PS
1.6 CDTi Bi-Turbo
1.6 T
1.6 T AT
1.6d 110PS
1.6d 136PS
1.6d 136PS AT
1.6
1.8 122PS
1.8 122PS AT
1.8 140PS
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS
2.0 DTI
2.0 Turbo
2.2 DTI
2.2 DTI AT
2.2 DIRECT
2.2 DIRECT Automatic
2.8 Turbo 230PS
2.8 250PS
3.0 CDTI 184PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS AT
3.2 211PS AT
3.2 211PS
OPC 2.8 Turbo
1.3 CDTI
1.4
1.6
1.6 ecoFLEX LPG
1.6 AT
1.7 CDTI 100PS
1.7 CDTI 125PS
1.7 CDTI 80PS
1.7 CDTI ecoFLEX
1.8
1.8 AT
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 120PS AT
1.9 CDTI 150PS
2.0 Turbo 170PS
2.0 Turbo 200PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1630 L / 57.6 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1850 L / 65.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent torsion beam
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.2 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
GM Epsilon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1500 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4702 mm / 185.1 in
4515 mm / 177.8 in
Size | Width
1809 mm / 71.2 in | 2042 mm / 80.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1871 mm / 73.7 in (mirror folded)
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Wheelbase
2662 mm / 104.8 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2703 mm / 106.4 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
222 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
0.31
Towing Capacity
720 kg / 1587 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
9%
27%
18%
Pros
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Better-looking than the sedan
- Rather good-looking
- Widely available with manual transmission
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Still uses semi-independent rear suspension
- Semi-independent suspensions in the rear
- Use of CVT
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Semi-independent suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.