HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Fabia 3 Combi facelift vs Renault Clio 4 Estate vs Renault Megane 4 Grand Tour

Variants
1.0 MPI 60PS
1.0 MPI 75PS
1.0 TSI 110PS
1.0 TSI 110PS DSG
1.0 TSI 95PS
1.0 TSI 95PS DSG
0.9 Energy TCe
1.2
1.2 TCe AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi AT
1.5 Energy dCi
1.2 Energy TCe 100PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS AT
1.3 TCe 115PS
1.3 TCe 140PS
1.3 TCe 140PS AT
1.3 TCe 160PS
1.3 TCe 160PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 95PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS AT
1.5 Energy dCi 90PS
1.6 Energy dCi 130PS
1.6 SCe 115PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
GT 1.6 Energy dCi AT
GT 1.6 Energy TCe AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1395 L / 49.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/45 R16
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1467 mm / 57.8 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4262 mm / 167.8 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
4626 mm / 182.1 in
Size | Width
1732 mm / 68.2 in
1732 mm / 68.2 in
1814 mm / 71.4 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
7, 0J x 16
Wheelbase
2470 mm / 97.2 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2712 mm / 106.8 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
76.4 mm / 3.0 in

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
4%
4%
14%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Not even fully independent suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.