HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Fabia 3 Combi vs Renault Megane 2 Grand Tour vs Renault Clio 4 Wagon facelift

Variants
1.0
1.0 TSI 110PS
1.0 TSI 110PS DSG
1.0 TSI 95PS
1.2 TSI 110PS
1.2 TSI 110PS DSG
1.2 TSI 90PS
1.4 TDI 105PS
1.4 TDI 90PS
1.4 TDI 90PS DSG
1.4 98PS
1.5 dCi 100PS
1.5 dCi 100PS AT
1.5 dCi 106PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 86PS
1.6 112PS
1.6 112PS AT
1.6 113PS
1.6 113PS AT
1.9 dCi 110PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
1.9 dCi 130PS
1.9 dCi 90PS
2.0 135PS
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 75
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 90

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1395 L / 49.3 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1600 L / 56.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1467 mm / 57.8 in
1467 mm / 57.8 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4257 mm / 167.6 in
4500 mm / 177.2 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
Size | Width
1732 mm / 68.2 in
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2026 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1732 mm / 68.2 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2470 mm / 97.2 in
2686 mm / 105.7 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Stroke
73.1 mm / 2.9 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
13%
12%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Much better looking than the sedan
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.