Compare Chrysler 300M vs Chrysler LHS 2 vs Chrysler 300 LD facelift
Variants
2.7
3.5
3.5
3.6 286
3.6 296
3.6 296 AWD
5.7
S 3.6 305
S 3.6 305 AWD
SRT 6.4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
462 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
475 kg / 1047 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler LH
Dimensions
Size | Height
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
5000 mm / 196.9 in
Size | Width
1920 mm / 75.6 in
1890 mm / 74.4 in
1902 mm / 74.9 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
3052 mm / 120.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1724 kg / 3801 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
4-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
1998 ~ 2004
1999 ~ 2001
2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
17%
18%
80%
Pros
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Decent power
- Lots of interior space
- Some love the quirky design
- Big HEMI V8
- Good handling dynamics
- Very comfortable
- Competitively priced
Cons
- Outdated transmission
- Questionable design language
- Average build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Uninspiring handling
- Poor reliability and build quality
- Some reliability concerns
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.