Compare Chrysler 300M vs Chrysler 200 II vs Chrysler Concorde II

Chrysler 300M

Chrysler 200 II

Chrysler Concorde II

Chrysler 300MChrysler 200 IIChrysler Concorde II
Variants
2.7
3.5
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited

Reviews

Neofiliac score17%29%7%
Pros
  • Fully-independent suspensions
  • Decent power
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
  • Outdated transmission
  • Questionable design language
  • Average build quality
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Simple rear suspension
  • Unique design language
  • Unreliable powertrain

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.