Compare Chrysler Concorde II vs Chrysler Sebring Sedan JR vs Chrysler Concorde II
Variants
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
2.0
2.0 5MT
2.4
2.7
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Helical spring
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Length
5310 mm / 209.1 in
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine
ECC
Engine | Redline
6464 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
7%
12%
7%
Pros
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
- Chrysler continued to improve it till the end
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.