Compare Chrysler 200 II vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback vs Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback

Chrysler 200 II

Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback

Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback

Chrysler 200 IIFord Mondeo 4 LiftbackFord Mondeo 2 Liftback
Variants
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 160
1.5 EcoBoost 160 AT
1.5D 120
1.6D 115
2.0 EcoBoost 203 AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 150 AWD
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 180
2.0D 180 AT
2.0D 180 AWD AT
2.0D 210 AT
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204

Reviews

Neofiliac score29%38%29%
Pros
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Lots of room inside
  • Good value for money
  • Easy to work on
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.