HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chrysler 200 II vs Chrysler Sebring Sedan JS vs Chrysler 200 JS

Variants
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.0 6MT
2.0 4AT
2.2D 6MT
2.2D 4AT
2.4 6MT
2.4 4AT
2.7 6MT
2.7 4AT
3.5 6MT
3.5 4AT
2.4 6AT
2.4 4AT
3.6 6AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
441 L / 15.6 cu-ft
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R17
215/55 R18
225/55 R17, 225/50 R18
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler JS platform
Chrysler JS

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
147 mm / 5.8 in
Size | Height
1491 mm / 58.7 in
1497 mm / 58.9 in
1482 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4884 mm / 192.3 in
4850 mm / 190.9 in
4870 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1871 mm / 73.7 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
17 in
6.5J x 17, 7J x 18
Wheelbase
2742 mm / 108.0 in
2767 mm / 108.9 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.34
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2017
2006 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
12%
15%
Pros
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • Fully-independent suspensions
  • No longer strange looking
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable design decisions
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Unreliable powertrain
  • Outdated engine and transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.