Compare Chrysler 200 II vs Mazda 3 / Axela (BK) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)

Chrysler 200 II

Mazda 3 / Axela (BK)

Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)

Chrysler 200 IIMazda 3 / Axela (BK)Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)
Variants
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
1.6
1.6 2006+
1.6 AT
1.6 AT 2006+
1.6D Euro3
1.6D Euro4
2.0
2.0 2006+
2.0D
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D
2.2D 163hp
2.2D 185hp
2.5
3.7 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score29%35%34%
Pros
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Elegant exterior design
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine option
  • Old transmission options
  • Sterile interior

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.