Compare Chrysler 200 JS vs Chrysler Sebring Sedan JS vs Chrysler 300M
Variants
2.4 6AT
2.4 4AT
3.6 6AT
2.0 6MT
2.0 4AT
2.2D 6MT
2.2D 4AT
2.4 6MT
2.4 4AT
2.7 6MT
2.7 4AT
3.5 6MT
3.5 4AT
2.7
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
441 L / 15.6 cu-ft
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R17, 225/50 R18
215/55 R18
225/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler JS
Chrysler JS platform
Chrysler LH
Dimensions
Size | Height
1482 mm / 58.3 in
1497 mm / 58.9 in
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
4870 mm / 191.7 in
4850 mm / 190.9 in
5000 mm / 196.9 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17, 7J x 18
Wheelbase
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2767 mm / 108.9 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
1998 ~ 2004
Reviews
Neofiliac score
15%
12%
17%
Pros
- No longer strange looking
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Decent power
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Unreliable powertrain
- Outdated engine and transmissions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable design decisions
- Outdated transmission
- Questionable design language
- Average build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.