Compare Chrysler 200 JS vs Subaru Legacy 7 vs Chrysler 300M
Variants
2.4 6AT
2.4 4AT
3.6 6AT
2.4 Turbo CVT
2.5 CVT
2.7
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 315 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 300 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R17, 225/50 R18
225/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler JS
Chrysler LH
Dimensions
Size | Height
1482 mm / 58.3 in
1501 mm / 59.1 in
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
4870 mm / 191.7 in
4841 mm / 190.6 in
5000 mm / 196.9 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1839 mm / 72.4 in
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17, 7J x 18
Wheelbase
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes)
3500 lb (Outback)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
CVT
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019
1998 ~ 2004
Debut
2019 Chicago Auto Show
Made In
Japan; USA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
15%
46%
17%
Pros
- No longer strange looking
- Powerful twin-turbo engine
- Comfortable cabin
- Lots of driver-assistance tech
- Good fuel economy
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Decent power
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Unreliable powertrain
- Outdated engine and transmissions
- Base engine is underwhelming
- Lacks standard all-wheel drive
- Outdated transmission
- Questionable design language
- Average build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.