Compare Chrysler Sebring Sedan JS vs Chrysler 300M vs Chrysler 200 JS
Variants
2.0 6MT
2.0 4AT
2.2D 6MT
2.2D 4AT
2.4 6MT
2.4 4AT
2.7 6MT
2.7 4AT
3.5 6MT
3.5 4AT
2.7
3.5
2.4 6AT
2.4 4AT
3.6 6AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
441 L / 15.6 cu-ft
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R18
225/55 R17
225/55 R17, 225/50 R18
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler JS platform
Chrysler LH
Chrysler JS
Dimensions
Size | Height
1497 mm / 58.9 in
1420 mm / 55.9 in
1482 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4850 mm / 190.9 in
5000 mm / 196.9 in
4870 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1920 mm / 75.6 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17, 7J x 18
Wheelbase
2767 mm / 108.9 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
1998 ~ 2004
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
17%
15%
Pros
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Decent power
- No longer strange looking
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable design decisions
- Outdated transmission
- Questionable design language
- Average build quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Unreliable powertrain
- Outdated engine and transmissions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.