HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chrysler Sebring Sedan JS vs Chrysler 200 II vs Chrysler 200 JS

Variants
2.0 6MT
2.0 4AT
2.2D 6MT
2.2D 4AT
2.4 6MT
2.4 4AT
2.7 6MT
2.7 4AT
3.5 6MT
3.5 4AT
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.4 6AT
2.4 4AT
3.6 6AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
441 L / 15.6 cu-ft
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.8 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R18
215/55 R17
225/55 R17, 225/50 R18
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler JS platform
Chrysler JS

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
147 mm / 5.8 in
Size | Height
1497 mm / 58.9 in
1491 mm / 58.7 in
1482 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4850 mm / 190.9 in
4884 mm / 192.3 in
4870 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1871 mm / 73.7 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
17 in
6.5J x 17, 7J x 18
Wheelbase
2767 mm / 108.9 in
2742 mm / 108.0 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.34
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010
2015 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
29%
15%
Pros
  • Fully-independent suspensions
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • No longer strange looking
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable design decisions
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Unreliable powertrain
  • Outdated engine and transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.