Compare Chrysler Sebring Sedan JS vs Chrysler LHS 2 vs Chrysler Concorde II

Variants
2.0 6MT
2.0 4AT
2.2D 6MT
2.2D 4AT
2.4 6MT
2.4 4AT
2.7 6MT
2.7 4AT
3.5 6MT
3.5 4AT
3.5
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
441 L / 15.6 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
475 kg / 1047 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
215/55 R18

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler JS platform

Dimensions

Size | Height
1497 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4850 mm / 190.9 in
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1890 mm / 74.4 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Wheelbase
2767 mm / 108.9 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010
1999 ~ 2001

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
18%
7%
Pros
  • Fully-independent suspensions
  • Lots of interior space
  • Some love the quirky design
  • Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable design decisions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Poor reliability and build quality
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Simple rear suspension
  • Unique design language
  • Unreliable powertrain

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.