HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Talisman vs Renault Latitude vs Renault Laguna III

Variants
TCe 160 4CONTROL
TCe 160 EDC FAP
Energy dCi 110 ECO2
Energy dCi 130
Energy dCi 130 EDC
Energy dCi 160 EDC6
Energy TCe 150 EDC7
Energy TCe 200 EDC7
Blue dCi 150
Blue dCi 150 4CONTROL
Energy TCe 225 4CONTROL EDC FAP
Energy TCe 225 EDC FAP
Blue dCi 200 EDC 4CONTROL EDC
Blue dCi 160 EDC
Blue dCi 200 4CONTROL EDC
Blue dCi 200 EDC
2.0 CVT
2.0
2.0 dCi 150hp
2.0 dCi 175hp AT
2.5 AT
3.0 dCi AT
3.5 AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro5
1.5 dCi Euro5 AT
1.6
2.0
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 131
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5
2.0 Euro5
2.0 Turbo AT
GT 2.0 dCi 150
GT 2.0 dCi 173
GT 2.0 dCi 173 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
608 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1022 L / 36.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
5-door Sedan
Platform
Renault-Nissan D platform

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1463 mm / 57.6 in
1483 mm / 58.4 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4849 mm / 190.9 in
4897 mm / 192.8 in
Size | Width
1832 mm / 72.1 in
1811 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
1512.0 mm / 59.5 in
Wheelbase
2762 mm / 108.7 in
2756 mm / 108.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
7%
13%
19%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Fuel consumption figures can be rather low
  • Has independent suspensions
  • Decent interior space
  • Small turning circle
  • Elegant styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad handling
  • Uninspiring design
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.